Slugs, muerte viscosa (1988)

Directed by Juan Piquer Simón [Other horror films: Escalofrío (1978), Misterio en la isla de los monstruos (1981), Mil gritos tiene la noche (1982), Los nuevos extraterrestres (1983), The Rift (1990), La mansión de los Cthulhu (1992)]

Slugs, muerte viscosa, commonly shortened to Slugs, is a pretty fun movie. There’s not many mollusk-based movies out there, and this Spanish addition probably does as much as can be done to make the plot palatable, and it’s worth seeing.

This is a movie I’ve heard about for years (though I never knew it was based on a book from 1982 titled Slugs, written by Shaun Hutsun, until I watched this one), and reception tends to be positive, which I can understand. It’s a quick-paced movie, it doesn’t take long at all to get into the slug action, and there’s more than a few enjoyable sequences spread throughout the film.

The finale here, for instance, had a pit of water filled with slugs which, of course, someone unfortunately fell into. A bedroom floor was covered with slugs, which led to some more deaths. A greenhouse blew up – quality explosive sequence, and in fact, there’s a lot of explosions toward the end, and it’s just a lot of fun.

While I wouldn’t call the movie overly gory, there are a few sequences which might be more disturbing, such as a man’s lunch being ruined by some parasites because he accidentally ate a slug. It’s a glorious sequence. The special effects throughout are all quite strong, actually, so Spain definitely came to play when they made this.

Most of the performances aren’t particularly noteworthy, though. Michael Garfield and Philip MacHale were fine, but they didn’t make that large an impression. John Battaglia was amusing at times, and Santiago Álvarez came through at the end, but again, no real lasting impressions. I did think that Kim Terry was a bit weak, but she didn’t appear too often, so that’s not a problem.

Oh, and a character wanted to declare a health emergency, and the reply he got was “You ain’t got the authority to declare ‘Happy Birthday.’ Not in this town.” I laughed quite a lot at that, and there were a few other humorous moments (“And what exactly do you do?”), but a lot of the film is played straight, which you might not necessarily expect from a killer slug movie.

As I always say, if it’s not mollusk, it’s not right, and Slugs is mollusk. It’s not a great movie, but it does have a lot going for it. I personally prefer the wormy goodness of Squirm, but Slugs is a solid movie worth experiencing at least once if you’re a fan of 80’s horror.

7.5/10

Jolly Roger: Massacre at Cutter’s Cove (2005)

Directed by Gary Jones [Other horror films: Mosquito (1994), Spiders (2000), Crocodile 2: Death Swamp (2002), Ghouls (2008), Boogeyman 3 (2008), Lightning Strikes (2009), Axe Giant: The Wrath of Paul Bunyan (2013)]

This film has always been a low-key guilty pleasure. I don’t think it’s a good movie, and it’s definitely not as fun rewatching as I’d hope it would be, but I’ve always had an okay time with it, and that has to count for something.

Many of the films I see coming from The Asylum are abysmal, but they sometimes get something close to right. The idea here – a pirate coming back from the dead to get revenge on the descendants of those who betrayed him – is at least worthwhile. It’s similar to The Fog, though with nowhere near the same level of class, charm, or atmosphere.

Actually, a better comparison might be Leprechaun, because like Leprechaun’s titular character, Jolly Roger is after not only revenge, and the heads of those who betrayed him, but the gold that was stolen from him. He also gets some one-liners every now and again, such as “Swab the decks in hell” and other pirate-themed humor like that.

Speaking of which, that joke that everyone knows about pirate-themed movies being rated arrgh – it’s in the opening scene of the movie, so check one for bad jokes brahs.

It’s not a terribly funny movie, though. There are some amusing sequences – such as Jolly Roger’s escapades in a strip joint (once informed they don’t have a license to sell liquor, he exclaims “I”ve never heard such an atrocity” and demanded to speak to the governor of the colony) and the mayor (played by Pamela Munro) attacking him – but overall, it can seem a bit dry, despite taking place in the coastal community of Cutter’s Cove.

I can’t say many of the performances were great. The two leads, Tom Nagel (The Beast of Bray Road, Hillside Cannibals, and The Butcher) and Kristina Korn, were okay, but neither one stellar. Thomas Downey (Frankenstein Reborn, Dracula’s Curse, Axe Giant: The Wrath of Paul Bunyan, and Sorority Party Massacre) was pretty generic, but Kim Little (Killers, Killers 2: The Beast, and Scarecrow Slayer) was decent. Jolly Roger was played by Rhett Giles (Way of the Vampire, Wraiths of Roanoke, The Fear Chamber, and Frankenstein Reborn), and he did pretty well. Also, while not a big role, I wanted to say I did like Megan Lee Ethridge (Alien Abduction) during the opening.

Most of the kills here are pretty terrible, as are the special effects, but at the very least, there was a guy who had his arm ripped off, and he was beaten to death with it, which has to count for something, I imagine. Overall, most of the kills are decapitations, one with a musket, and not many of them look that great.

Really, with a title like Jolly Roger: Massacre at Cutter’s Cove, the movie should have been a lot more fun. As it is, I’ve seen it a handful of times before, perhaps as many as three, and I’ve always enjoyed it for what it is. It’s not a movie I’d call good, but I do think, at least for me, it settles somewhere around average.

7/10

KILD TV (2016)

Directed by William Collins [Other horror films: N/A]

While I wouldn’t call KILD TV a stellar film, I will say that it exceeded my expectations, and ended up being a decently fun movie.

The current rating (disclaimer: this review was written on October 29th, 2021) this film has on IMDb, with 258 votes, is 3.9/10, and that’s just a disgrace. KILD TV may not be overly original, but the plot is sort of fun, and the mystery here is moderately engaging. The gore isn’t great, but it’s also not bad, so I don’t know what people were expecting from the movie to give the film such a low rating.

Taking place overnight at a broadcasting station, the film follows the crew of a local Svengali-type program as they’re killed off one-by-one by a mysterious killer. Like I said, it may not be original, but most of the important characters are decent, and the idea that, when they go on air begging for people to call the police, and the audience thinks it’s part of the program, was a nice touch.

None of the kills are overly memorable, though I did like this one individual who got crushed between two vehicles, and there was another fellow who met a grisly end from a boxcutter. I think KILD TV is more about the story and the mystery of the killer than the gore, but for what they have, it’s not that bad.

I think my biggest detractor is the finale of the film. I don’t mind who the killer turns out to be, but I always hated endings where a character was acting completely normal up to a point, and then, once revealed as the killer, becomes insanely manic. It bugged me in Urban Legend, for instance, and it bugged me a bit here. Otherwise, I did appreciate how they didn’t do some last-second scare – such as the killer opening their eyes and then cutting to the credits – which might be faint praise, but praise nonetheless.

Easily the best performance here is from D.C. Douglas (Isle of the Dead, Deadwater, Killers 2: The Beast, and Aquarium of the Dead), who played the late night Svengali-like host, Dr. Perseco. He was as corny and hammy on-screen as you’d expect from those personalities (reminding me of Trent Haaga in Slices), but outside of character, he was great too. More than anyone else, he tried to keep a calm head and figure out who the killer was, looked for clues, and insisted the group stick together. An all-around great character, Douglas was great here.

Other than Douglas, I don’t know if too many performances stand out. Grace Johnston (Bloodlines) started out a bit shaky, but she grew on me. Jared Doreck (Backstabber) had a fun stoner personality, but didn’t do a whole lot. Others, such as Heather Williams, face the same fate. Astrea Campbell-Cobb has strong and weak moments, and though it took a while, Dan Braverman (The Hours Till Daylight) turned into a pretty solid character.

One thing I wanted to note – being a late night horror presentation, they show clips of a movie throughout KILD TV, but what surprised me is that the movie they’re showing is real, being a 2013 film titled Conjoined. At first, I thought perhaps Conjoined was also directed by William Collins, who directed this film, but that’s not the case. I suspect it’s because both films were made in Texas, and it’s a way to promote the Texas horror scene, which I can appreciate.

KILD TV isn’t likely to win any awards, but I thought it had decent production value behind it, the story was pretty good, the mystery highly appreciated, and though it’s not a great film, I didn’t think it was half bad at all, and I think if you’re a slasher fan, it may have something to offer you.

7.5/10

Lunch Meat (1987)

Directed by Kirk Alex [Other horror films: N/A]

More than anything, Lunch Meat is a bit of a tedious film. The plot isn’t anything terrible, but the approach is quite dull, and I don’t really think Lunch Meat has a lot going for it.

In fact, the most interesting thing about the film is that, if you search for it on IMDb, it won’t come up. This seems to be because one of the actresses, Ashlyn Gere, later went on to do pornographic films, and maybe IMDb thinks Lunch Meat is one of them. Maybe because it has “meat” in the title. It’s odd, because other films she was in, such as Creepozoids, Dreamaniac, and Evil Laugh, all come up without an issue.

That’s easily the most interesting thing about Lunch Meat, though. The story isn’t bad – imagine if Wrong Turn were made 16 years earlier on a shoe-string budget, and you’d get the picture. A man and his three sons kill people for meat, and six young folks run amok of them. It might sound like an okay film, and it probably could have been under different circumstances, but it just feels so dull.

To be honest, none of the six protagonists (Bob Joseph, Ashlyn Gere, Joe Ricciardella, Marie Ruzicka, Rick Lorentz, and Patricia Christie) really stood out. I guess Ricciardella had some of the better scenes – trying to set traps against those coming after him – but they were all relatively without character and pretty interchangeable. The four cannibal antagonists (Chuck Ellis, Mitch Rogers, Robert Oland, and Elroy Wiese) were a little more interesting, but not much, and certainly none are anywhere close as fun as we get 16 years later in Wrong Turn.

Also, the gore is pretty non-existent. I guess there’s a decapitation somewhat early on, but it’s one of the least memorable decapitations imaginable, and few of the other scenes do much. Someone gets stabbed a lot, a couple of people get a pickaxe through the foot, and someone gets beaten with a stick, but there’s nothing here that would really impress most people.

A movie like Lunch Meat could have been, at the very least, entertaining, but the approach the film takes is so dry, even during the more action-oriented portions. There’s never much in the way of tension or dread, we never really learn much about the characters, and it’s just a rough movie throughout.

5.5/10

La casa del fin de los tiempos (2013)

Directed by Alejandro Hidalgo [Other horror films: The Exorcism of God (2021)]

This film blew me away. La casa del fin de los tiempos, better known to the English tongue as The House at the End of Time, is not only one of the best time-related horror films I’ve seen, but also among one of the best films I’ve seen.

I expected the film to be good, to be sure. That’s why I went out of my way to watch it. What I didn’t expect was to love the film, and that’s what happened. The story here is quite tragic, and quite beautiful, and has so much going for it. It’s a movie with pure feeling, and I won’t lie, I did tear up during the final ten minutes.

Horror movies aren’t often an emotional experience for me, at least not to the extent this one was. To add to the surprise, I’ve never even seen a film from Venezuela before, so the fact that this one worked to such a superb extent amazed me. What’s even more is that most time-related horror films aren’t great – I know Triangle has it’s fans, but I’m definitely not one of them, and while Timecrimes is okay, I ultimately think it falls around average. Happy Death Day is solid fun, but it’s not much more. The House at the End of Time, however, is on another level.

There’s a drama/fantasy/crime/mystery movie from 2000 called Frequency. That’s the best comparison I can come up with, because much like that movie, The House at the End of Time is an emotional ride, it’s time aspects all make sense and are consistent throughout, and the film can be quite moving at times. There are small twists throughout, and there was one at the end that just got me (it wasn’t necessarily a twist if you were paying close attention, but I suspect like myself, many people wouldn’t be), which was masterfully done.

In fact, the whole movie could be described as masterful. I’ll admit, when I began the film, and it looked like it started in media res, I cringed. I don’t mean internally – I mean, I actually physically cringed. But that’s not what this film did – from the opening, it jumps thirty years, and throughout the film, we get a good smattering of present-day material with material from thirty years previous, and sometimes a bit of both. The narrative structure of the film was amazing. Just amazing.

Everyone made this movie work. Ruddy Rodríguez was amazing. As brothers, Rosmel Bustamante and Héctor Mercado were amazing. Guillermo Garcia looked damn beast, and he was amazing. Gonzalo Cubero, well, need I say it? His character was a tragic one, and the actor did fantastically.

While there is violence in the film, that’s not at all the focus nor import here. It’s more an emotional ride, and some of the more violent scenes, such as one involving a game of baseball among children, also pack an emotional punch. That baseball scene in particular was fantastically-shot, and there are scenes toward the finale that also whisper of magnificence.

I had no idea what I was getting into when I started The House at the End of Time. I was expecting a good movie, but I was not expecting an amazing movie, and this one blew me away in ways I hope it will continue to do in the future. This isn’t going to be a movie for everyone, but it couldn’t have been better in my eyes.

10/10

Galaxy of Terror (1981)

Directed by Bruce D. Clark [Other horror films: N/A]

I can’t say that I overall care a lot about Galaxy of Terror, but I do appreciate that it had heart, and while the final product isn’t great, I can dig what they were going for.

Most of the small problems work themselves out. For instance, throwing us headfirst into a strange world with no context and characters with odd names (we have Trantor, Baelon, Cabren, Alluma, Quuhod, Kore, Dameia, Ilvar, Cos, and Ranger) and no real introductions, it can be tough, but after a while, the characters get differentiated nicely, and before long, you can tell a Quuhod from a Dameia in no time.

The larger problem is the conclusion to Galaxy of Terror. It’s unsatisfactory, yes, but more than that, I don’t know how much sense it makes, at least with what I was able to gather. Parts of it, such as the origin of the pyramid, were sort of cool, but other aspects just felt too unexplained.

Aside from the final ten minutes, though, the film is pretty decent. There are some pretty memorable kills: a dismembered arm kills the person it came from with a crystal star, someone has their stomach slit open and is thrown down a rather long chasm, and another poor soul is crushed to death, and it looks like their head explodes. Oh, and there’s also a rather gruesome alien rape scene that I’d rather not think too much about. Truth be told, that’s a scene I could have done without.

The performances were largely solid too. To be honest, I didn’t think too much of Edward Albert (The House Where Evil Dwells, Sea of Fear, Killer Bees, Demon Keeper), but it’s not as though he were a bad lead. It’s just that this film also has Sid Haig (House of 1000 Corpses, A Dead Calling) and Robert Englund (A Nightmare on Elm Street, Kantemir, Eaten Alive), so it’s difficult for Albert to stand out. It could be fairly said that neither Haig nor Englund do much, but I did like’s Haig’s character, as I don’t know many people who live and die by the crystal, and Englund had surprisingly high staying power.

Regardless, those three were among the most memorable, but I also thought Bernard Behrens, Ray Walston (The Stand), Grace Zabriskie and Erin Moran did well. The best of these four would probably be Walston, but I can’t say I loved where his story went, and Behrens was a rather more likable individual.

It’s a shame, really. I went into Galaxy of Terror with the hopes of singing it’s praises. It’s a film I’ve seen before, and I remember it a bit more fondly. I think I probably spaced out toward the end, or perhaps it’s because the movie feels like it should be better. It’s not the earliest space-based horror (even discounting Alien, you have both Planet of the Vampires and It! The Terror from Beyond Space), but it seems to me that it should be one of the funnest, and I just don’t know if it personally hits that level with me.

All-in-all, I didn’t have a bad time revisiting this movie. I really didn’t care for the finale, though, and unfortunately, as okay as the rest of the movie could sometimes be, I think the film falls a bit below average, at least for me.

6/10

The Spirits of Jupiter (1984)

Directed by Russell Kern [Other horror films: N/A]

I’m not sure what this mid-80’s obscurity was supposed to be, but if there’s one thing you can say about The Spirits of Jupiter, you have to admit it’s unique.

Reminding me a bit of films like The Crazies and The Carrier, The Spirits of Jupiter deals with the impact that an astrological event has on a small Colorado town. People go crazy – some of it’s harmless, such as lying on your back and riding a bike in the middle of the sidewalk – but most of it results in violence, especially from the police force, who end up shooting everyone on sight.

It’s not an easy movie to describe. There’s a lot of action sequences and chases (be it chases in the air between a helicopter and a plane or ground chases on motorcycle), so it has an action vibe going, but it also has people becoming unstable, resulting in massive death and violence, which is where I’m guessing the horror label comes in. Oh, and let’s not forget this is caused by the gravitational pull of Jupiter or something (they give a six, seven minute explanation of what’s going on about halfway through, but I was already checked out, tbh) which gives the film a science fiction twist.

Here’s the thing – the movie doesn’t have a bad idea or set-up. It’s a mildly interesting idea – a rugged, mine owner has to go into a town full of crazies and rescue his son and daughter – and the action sequences on their own are all pretty solid. In fact, there’s a decent amount of solid scenes in the film.

For instance, the hero early on, who is also a plane pilot, is leaning out of his plane and shooting people, which was hardcore. A police officer pulls over a woman and, upon seeing her license is expired, shoots her in the head. A woman complains to a butcher about the quality of the meat, and gets her hand chopped off. The police lined up a group of people and shot them all down. And let’s not forget the motorcycle chase toward the end.

However, here’s the other thing – this movie is an hour and 47 minutes long. It’s way too damn long, and while some of the sequences are decent, they don’t pop up near enough and, truthfully, they’re probably not worth it anyway. There’s also the matter about some of the comedy – a lot of it comes from Richard Luna’s character, but there’s other characters, such as the manager at the mines (IMDb doesn’t list many credits, and the VHS rip that I saw this in does not lend much clarity to the matter) who just have sort of a slapstick feel. It’s intentional, I’m sure, but it’s not particularly enjoyable.

I admit, I thought Rex Cutter made a nice, rugged lead. He had an occasional John Wayne thing going, which I can appreciate in short bursts. James Aerni was amusing at times, and made an okay antagonist when he bent that way, I guess. Otherwise, given the scant nature of the credits, I’ll just say that few even came close to standing out, aside from Richard Luna as the self-monikered Nostradamus, a character who cared far too much about coffee and not near enough about being sensible.

If you’ve seen The Spirits of Jupiter, and you can excuse the lengthy runtime, you might have had a good time with it. It’s lower-budget, but I certainly don’t think it’s a movie that didn’t try. To be clear, I don’t exactly know what it was trying, but I do know that it tried. It’s not a movie I liked that much – portions were okay, but getting there took so damn long – but if you want something different, and you have a couple of hours to waste, give it a shot.

5.5/10

I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

Directed by Jim Gillespie [Other horror films: D-Tox (2002), Venom (2005)]

Among the many slashers to crop up once Scream re-ignited the subgenre, I Know What You Did Last Summer is among the best. It’s nowhere as good as Scream, but it is a very solid movie, partially due to a combination of the story and the setting.

I’m a sucker for oceans. I’ve never personally seen an ocean, at least in living memory, so I was always fascinated by coastal communities, especially small coastal communities. And since I Know What You Did Last Summer primarily takes place in a tiny coastal community in North Carolina, it had me from hello.

Of course, most people know the plot of this one – four teenagers cause an accidental manslaughter, and once they get rid of the evidence, they make a pact to never bring it up again. Alas, a year later, at the anniversary of the incident, a killer wearing a long, black slicker and wielding a hook, hunts them down.

We know the plot, which is fun enough, but what I didn’t know is that it’s partially based on a novel by Lois Duncan, titled, believe it or not, I Know What You Did Last Summer. It’s a thriller written for young adults as opposed to a slasher (and in fact, Duncan wasn’t happy with the slasher approach to the story the film took), but the main plot is all there, which is somewhat fascinating.

I’ve always loved the design of the fisherman here. The long, black slicker, sticking up so it hides their face, that black hat, that hook – I won’t say it’s a better look than Ghostface, but it is among one of my favorite looks among slasher antagonists, and he wields a hook almost as beautifully as Candyman (albeit with less gore). The setting is great, as we see plenty of water, boats, crabs, fishing nets, as is the atmosphere, and much like the killer’s design, I’ve always loved it.

Though it’s not a gory movie, I Know What You Did Last Summer does have some very solid scenes, the tension perhaps making up for lack of blood. I think the sequence in which Sarah Michelle Gellar’s character is chased is the best, especially the attack behind the tires, just feet away from a bustling parade. That was just fantastically shot. A sequence that has the fisherman creeping into Gellar’s house, causing her to wake up the following morning with a message on her mirror, was quality also. There’s also the finale on the boat – with bodies packed in ice and hooks flying everywhere, worth seeing if nautical nonsense is something you’d wish.

Jennifer Love Hewitt was pretty decent as the more likable character of assholes. To be fair, I don’t think any of the four kids are particularly sympathetic, but Hewitt’s was occasionally the most moral. Freddie Prinze Jr., Sarah Michelle Gellar, and Ryan Phillippe all had their moments, Gellar perhaps being the strongest. Anne Heche (who I know from both Volcano and the Psycho remake) had some good scenes, and I entirely forget Johnny Galecki was in this, which means I haven’t seen this film since I started The Big Bang Theory, which shows exactly how long it’s been.

And it has been years since I’ve seen this, which is one of the reasons I was quite excited to revisit it. Unlike other post-Scream slashers that disappointed me upon rewatches (such as Urban Legend and Valentine), I Know What You Did Last Summer held up pretty well. It’s even better than another of my personal favorites, being Cherry Falls, and is overall a fun and memorable film with a good mystery and well-designed killer.

8/10

3615 code Père Noël (1989)

Directed by René Manzor [Other horror films: N/A]

I’m not surprised this French horror film, known under various titles such as Dial Code Santa Claus, Game Over, and Deadly Games, is a good film, but I will say I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed it. 3615 code Père Noël is a pretty tense and thrilling film, and it’s certainly worth a watch.

The story here is pretty fun and original, in an early home invasion way. A precocious young kid has to defend himself and his grandfather from a madman stalking them around their house. It’s now you might think that a house isn’t big enough to last a movie, but by house, I mean mansion, because this kid is from a wealthy family, and their abode is quite humongous, complete with suits of armor and hidden passages (not to mention trapdoors – I told you, the kid is precocious).

In fact, it’s almost unbelievable, but I can buy that a kid who grew up with all the advantages this kid did would be more well-rounded in the ways of Rambo. When your mother gets you every expensive item on your Christmas wish list, not to mention additional presents, it’s not difficult at all for me to imagine this kid may be a bit more developed than others his age.

It’s not an overly violent film or anything, but once the action starts going, it’s rather tense. Partially it’s because the grandfather (played by Louis Ducreux)  is so vulnerable – not only is he older, and unable to move too quickly, but he needs insulin shots and has rather atrocious eyesight, and he’s such a good character too, playing Dungeons and Dragons with his much younger grandson. You don’t want to see him anywhere close to hurt, which ratchets up the tension.

Alain Lalanne is decent as the lead. I don’t generally care for kid actors, but Lalanne is quite believable. I do think that Louis Ducreux’s role as the grandfather humanizes him, though – giving him someone that he has to protect gives Lalanne a deeper character as opposed to having him just defend himself. We never learn too much about Patrick Floersheim’s character, but I really dug the opening scene with him in the snowball fight, and I think we learn all we need to about his mental state as the film goes on.

Among my favorite scenes in 3615 code Père Noël would be when Lalanne’s character tries to escape on the roof. This is a tall structure, and that scene was filmed quite well (think Halloween 4, only more intense), and again, it’s tense, as the roof is covered in snow, and the kid indeed does slip once. It’s a good time. There’s also a montage of a dog later on – it’s a small thing, but somewhat emotional, as the dog was another of my favorite characters.

This film has a lot of Christmas feeling to it, and now that I’ve seen it, it’s probably among one of my favorite Christmas horror films, which include Gremlins, To All a Goodnight, Don’t Open Till Christmas, and Santa’s Slay. 36.15 code Père Noël is a fantastic film, and while it might be low on bodycount, this French film isn’t low on suspense. Definitely worth seeing for fans of the genre.

8.5/10

Kansen (2004)

Directed by Masayuki Ochiai [Other horror films: Yonimo kimyô na monogatari: Haru no tokubetsu hen (1991), Parasaito Ivu (1997), Yonimo kimyô na monogatari: ’97 haru no tokubetsu hen (1997, segment ‘Tobira no saki’), Saimin (1999), Yonimo kimyô na monogatari – Eiga no tokubetsu hen (2000, segment ‘Samurai Cellular’), Yonimo kimyô na monogatari: Haru no tokubetsu hen (2001, segment ‘Shinzô no omoide’), Yo nimo Kimyou na Monogatari: 2003 Spring Special (2003), Yo nimo Kimyou na Monogatari: 2003 Fall Special (2003), Suiyô puremia: sekai saikyô J horâ SP Nihon no kowai yoru (2004, segment ‘Yokan’), Shutter (2008), Gekijô-ban: Kaidan resutoran (2010), Gakkou no kaidan: Noroi no kotodama (2014), Ju-on: Owari no hajimari (2014), Ju-on: Za fainaru (2015)]

Known in the USA as Infection, this Japanese movie is a bit of a favorite of mine. I can’t say the finale entirely makes sense to me – a few things still aren’t quite clear – but the atmosphere and tense nature of the film make Kansen a movie definitely worth seeing.

The setting is great, taking place in an understaffed hospital with overworked doctors and nurses. They’ve stopped receiving pay, they’re running out of medical supplies, but they’re still trying their best to care for the patients they have. And during an overnight shift, more goes wrong than one could imagine.

Somewhat psychological in it’s approach, Kansen can definitely be a spooky movie. A dark hospital, limited staff, sick and dying patients, a deadly infection raging that liquifies organs, it’s not a good time. Of course, watching the film is a different matter, as it’s a lot of fun, even if some elements that come up at the end don’t seem entirely sensical. It’s definitely a movie that’ll have you reading theories after it concludes, which isn’t always a good thing, but here, I can make a slight exception.

Kôichi Satô and Masanobu Takashima make for fair leads here. Shirô Sano doesn’t have much in the way of personality, but that’s partially the point. Among those who played the nurses, I think both Kaho Minami and Mari Hoshino stood out the best. I also liked the elderly patient – she’s not credited on IMDb nor Wikipedia, but she was good, and it was amusing seeing Isao Yatsu pop up a bit, as I just saw him a few days back in Dark Water.

I wouldn’t say Kansen is an overly violent film, but it can be a bit gruesome at times. There’s an infection that, as I said earlier, liquifies the organs. We never see this in detail, but we do see plenty of green gloop (the remainder of the infected), which can be disgusting. There’s a few disturbing sequences – a woman plunges her hands into scalding hot water, and there’s a corpse rotting under intense heat (it makes sense in context), with bandages and I imagine skin sloughing off. All of this is to say it’s not an overly gory film, but it can be gruesome.

Again on the finale – when I first saw the film, I probably liked it a bit more. Maybe I was young and impressionable, but whatever the reason, it’s not quite as strong now. I don’t mind leaving a few things up to interpretation, and plenty of the film can make sense under a certain lens, but I just wish we got a little more explanation in the final ten minutes than what we did. Either way, the locker sequence at the end was quality, along with a fact we learn from a news report, so it’s not as if the finale doesn’t have something to appreciate.

Despite the fact that I don’t entirely love the conclusion to Kansen, I still think it’s quite a strong film, and it remains among my personal favorite Asian horror films. Hopefully future viewings will clear a few things up, but on the positive side, at least this is a film I would easily watch again in the future, which is definitely not true for many others.

8/10