Lunch Meat (1987)

Directed by Kirk Alex [Other horror films: N/A]

More than anything, Lunch Meat is a bit of a tedious film. The plot isn’t anything terrible, but the approach is quite dull, and I don’t really think Lunch Meat has a lot going for it.

In fact, the most interesting thing about the film is that, if you search for it on IMDb, it won’t come up. This seems to be because one of the actresses, Ashlyn Gere, later went on to do pornographic films, and maybe IMDb thinks Lunch Meat is one of them. Maybe because it has “meat” in the title. It’s odd, because other films she was in, such as Creepozoids, Dreamaniac, and Evil Laugh, all come up without an issue.

That’s easily the most interesting thing about Lunch Meat, though. The story isn’t bad – imagine if Wrong Turn were made 16 years earlier on a shoe-string budget, and you’d get the picture. A man and his three sons kill people for meat, and six young folks run amok of them. It might sound like an okay film, and it probably could have been under different circumstances, but it just feels so dull.

To be honest, none of the six protagonists (Bob Joseph, Ashlyn Gere, Joe Ricciardella, Marie Ruzicka, Rick Lorentz, and Patricia Christie) really stood out. I guess Ricciardella had some of the better scenes – trying to set traps against those coming after him – but they were all relatively without character and pretty interchangeable. The four cannibal antagonists (Chuck Ellis, Mitch Rogers, Robert Oland, and Elroy Wiese) were a little more interesting, but not much, and certainly none are anywhere close as fun as we get 16 years later in Wrong Turn.

Also, the gore is pretty non-existent. I guess there’s a decapitation somewhat early on, but it’s one of the least memorable decapitations imaginable, and few of the other scenes do much. Someone gets stabbed a lot, a couple of people get a pickaxe through the foot, and someone gets beaten with a stick, but there’s nothing here that would really impress most people.

A movie like Lunch Meat could have been, at the very least, entertaining, but the approach the film takes is so dry, even during the more action-oriented portions. There’s never much in the way of tension or dread, we never really learn much about the characters, and it’s just a rough movie throughout.

5.5/10

Galaxy of Terror (1981)

Directed by Bruce D. Clark [Other horror films: N/A]

I can’t say that I overall care a lot about Galaxy of Terror, but I do appreciate that it had heart, and while the final product isn’t great, I can dig what they were going for.

Most of the small problems work themselves out. For instance, throwing us headfirst into a strange world with no context and characters with odd names (we have Trantor, Baelon, Cabren, Alluma, Quuhod, Kore, Dameia, Ilvar, Cos, and Ranger) and no real introductions, it can be tough, but after a while, the characters get differentiated nicely, and before long, you can tell a Quuhod from a Dameia in no time.

The larger problem is the conclusion to Galaxy of Terror. It’s unsatisfactory, yes, but more than that, I don’t know how much sense it makes, at least with what I was able to gather. Parts of it, such as the origin of the pyramid, were sort of cool, but other aspects just felt too unexplained.

Aside from the final ten minutes, though, the film is pretty decent. There are some pretty memorable kills: a dismembered arm kills the person it came from with a crystal star, someone has their stomach slit open and is thrown down a rather long chasm, and another poor soul is crushed to death, and it looks like their head explodes. Oh, and there’s also a rather gruesome alien rape scene that I’d rather not think too much about. Truth be told, that’s a scene I could have done without.

The performances were largely solid too. To be honest, I didn’t think too much of Edward Albert (The House Where Evil Dwells, Sea of Fear, Killer Bees, Demon Keeper), but it’s not as though he were a bad lead. It’s just that this film also has Sid Haig (House of 1000 Corpses, A Dead Calling) and Robert Englund (A Nightmare on Elm Street, Kantemir, Eaten Alive), so it’s difficult for Albert to stand out. It could be fairly said that neither Haig nor Englund do much, but I did like’s Haig’s character, as I don’t know many people who live and die by the crystal, and Englund had surprisingly high staying power.

Regardless, those three were among the most memorable, but I also thought Bernard Behrens, Ray Walston (The Stand), Grace Zabriskie and Erin Moran did well. The best of these four would probably be Walston, but I can’t say I loved where his story went, and Behrens was a rather more likable individual.

It’s a shame, really. I went into Galaxy of Terror with the hopes of singing it’s praises. It’s a film I’ve seen before, and I remember it a bit more fondly. I think I probably spaced out toward the end, or perhaps it’s because the movie feels like it should be better. It’s not the earliest space-based horror (even discounting Alien, you have both Planet of the Vampires and It! The Terror from Beyond Space), but it seems to me that it should be one of the funnest, and I just don’t know if it personally hits that level with me.

All-in-all, I didn’t have a bad time revisiting this movie. I really didn’t care for the finale, though, and unfortunately, as okay as the rest of the movie could sometimes be, I think the film falls a bit below average, at least for me.

6/10

The Spirits of Jupiter (1984)

Directed by Russell Kern [Other horror films: N/A]

I’m not sure what this mid-80’s obscurity was supposed to be, but if there’s one thing you can say about The Spirits of Jupiter, you have to admit it’s unique.

Reminding me a bit of films like The Crazies and The Carrier, The Spirits of Jupiter deals with the impact that an astrological event has on a small Colorado town. People go crazy – some of it’s harmless, such as lying on your back and riding a bike in the middle of the sidewalk – but most of it results in violence, especially from the police force, who end up shooting everyone on sight.

It’s not an easy movie to describe. There’s a lot of action sequences and chases (be it chases in the air between a helicopter and a plane or ground chases on motorcycle), so it has an action vibe going, but it also has people becoming unstable, resulting in massive death and violence, which is where I’m guessing the horror label comes in. Oh, and let’s not forget this is caused by the gravitational pull of Jupiter or something (they give a six, seven minute explanation of what’s going on about halfway through, but I was already checked out, tbh) which gives the film a science fiction twist.

Here’s the thing – the movie doesn’t have a bad idea or set-up. It’s a mildly interesting idea – a rugged, mine owner has to go into a town full of crazies and rescue his son and daughter – and the action sequences on their own are all pretty solid. In fact, there’s a decent amount of solid scenes in the film.

For instance, the hero early on, who is also a plane pilot, is leaning out of his plane and shooting people, which was hardcore. A police officer pulls over a woman and, upon seeing her license is expired, shoots her in the head. A woman complains to a butcher about the quality of the meat, and gets her hand chopped off. The police lined up a group of people and shot them all down. And let’s not forget the motorcycle chase toward the end.

However, here’s the other thing – this movie is an hour and 47 minutes long. It’s way too damn long, and while some of the sequences are decent, they don’t pop up near enough and, truthfully, they’re probably not worth it anyway. There’s also the matter about some of the comedy – a lot of it comes from Richard Luna’s character, but there’s other characters, such as the manager at the mines (IMDb doesn’t list many credits, and the VHS rip that I saw this in does not lend much clarity to the matter) who just have sort of a slapstick feel. It’s intentional, I’m sure, but it’s not particularly enjoyable.

I admit, I thought Rex Cutter made a nice, rugged lead. He had an occasional John Wayne thing going, which I can appreciate in short bursts. James Aerni was amusing at times, and made an okay antagonist when he bent that way, I guess. Otherwise, given the scant nature of the credits, I’ll just say that few even came close to standing out, aside from Richard Luna as the self-monikered Nostradamus, a character who cared far too much about coffee and not near enough about being sensible.

If you’ve seen The Spirits of Jupiter, and you can excuse the lengthy runtime, you might have had a good time with it. It’s lower-budget, but I certainly don’t think it’s a movie that didn’t try. To be clear, I don’t exactly know what it was trying, but I do know that it tried. It’s not a movie I liked that much – portions were okay, but getting there took so damn long – but if you want something different, and you have a couple of hours to waste, give it a shot.

5.5/10

3615 code Père Noël (1989)

Directed by René Manzor [Other horror films: N/A]

I’m not surprised this French horror film, known under various titles such as Dial Code Santa Claus, Game Over, and Deadly Games, is a good film, but I will say I’m surprised by how much I enjoyed it. 3615 code Père Noël is a pretty tense and thrilling film, and it’s certainly worth a watch.

The story here is pretty fun and original, in an early home invasion way. A precocious young kid has to defend himself and his grandfather from a madman stalking them around their house. It’s now you might think that a house isn’t big enough to last a movie, but by house, I mean mansion, because this kid is from a wealthy family, and their abode is quite humongous, complete with suits of armor and hidden passages (not to mention trapdoors – I told you, the kid is precocious).

In fact, it’s almost unbelievable, but I can buy that a kid who grew up with all the advantages this kid did would be more well-rounded in the ways of Rambo. When your mother gets you every expensive item on your Christmas wish list, not to mention additional presents, it’s not difficult at all for me to imagine this kid may be a bit more developed than others his age.

It’s not an overly violent film or anything, but once the action starts going, it’s rather tense. Partially it’s because the grandfather (played by Louis Ducreux)  is so vulnerable – not only is he older, and unable to move too quickly, but he needs insulin shots and has rather atrocious eyesight, and he’s such a good character too, playing Dungeons and Dragons with his much younger grandson. You don’t want to see him anywhere close to hurt, which ratchets up the tension.

Alain Lalanne is decent as the lead. I don’t generally care for kid actors, but Lalanne is quite believable. I do think that Louis Ducreux’s role as the grandfather humanizes him, though – giving him someone that he has to protect gives Lalanne a deeper character as opposed to having him just defend himself. We never learn too much about Patrick Floersheim’s character, but I really dug the opening scene with him in the snowball fight, and I think we learn all we need to about his mental state as the film goes on.

Among my favorite scenes in 3615 code Père Noël would be when Lalanne’s character tries to escape on the roof. This is a tall structure, and that scene was filmed quite well (think Halloween 4, only more intense), and again, it’s tense, as the roof is covered in snow, and the kid indeed does slip once. It’s a good time. There’s also a montage of a dog later on – it’s a small thing, but somewhat emotional, as the dog was another of my favorite characters.

This film has a lot of Christmas feeling to it, and now that I’ve seen it, it’s probably among one of my favorite Christmas horror films, which include Gremlins, To All a Goodnight, Don’t Open Till Christmas, and Santa’s Slay. 36.15 code Père Noël is a fantastic film, and while it might be low on bodycount, this French film isn’t low on suspense. Definitely worth seeing for fans of the genre.

8.5/10

Batoru hîtâ (1989)

Directed by Jôji Iida [Other horror films: Kikuropusu (1987), Tokyo Babylon 1999 (1993), Naito heddo (1995), Rasen (1998), Anaza hevun (2000), Hoshi Shin’ichi Mystery Special (2014)]

Known as Battle Heater, this Japanese film deals with a kotatsu heater that goes around and kills people. It’s not a bad movie for it’s sort of goofy niche, but therein lies the problem for me, which is that the movie is just a bit goofy for me.

Sometimes that doesn’t matter. Hausu is a pretty silly movie, but not only do I rather enjoy that, but I consider it a classic of Japanese horror. Bio-Zombie (or Sang faa sau see) is still fun despite how goofy it can be. Tokyo Zombie (Tôkyô zonbi) is the same way, though I do think that one trends more toward average.

My point is that sometimes I can deal with goofy elements in my movies, but at other times, it just comes on way too strong, and Battle Heater is an example of that. It’s okay in it’s niche, but from the goofy characters to the silly set-up, it’s not really my type of thing. From a giant rock hitting a character to indicate the end of the film (the rock says ‘end,’ so it feels like Monty Python) to an electrical-based superhero suit being made to battle the heater, it’s humor is highly silly.

I can appreciate portions of the film, though. A killer kotatsu is a wild concept, and for those who don’t know (myself included before I started the film), a kotatsu is a type of electric heater used almost exclusively in Japan. It looks sort of comfy, and deciding to make that thing some type of homicidal entity is amusing in of itself.

Also, some of the comedy is okay. There’s a scene early on in which two characters stare at each other for a ridiculously long time. At first it was just awkward, but as it spanned into a longer scene, it was just amusing, and had me laughing come the end of it. There’s also a miscommunication regarding a map, which leads to a bunch of crying Japanese high school girls winding up at a low-budget apartment complex for a concert. It’s random, but funny.

Out of the performances, I’d say the best ones were Pappara Kawai and Gorô Kishitani. Kishitani is probably the straightest character, and I appreciated that, but he’s also a bit of a dick, so that takes some enjoyment away. Pappara Kawai does grow on me over the course of the film, as he starts off quite shaky, but he does sort of grow into himself.

This is a pretty obscure movie, and I sense that the right audience would definitely enjoy this movie. It’s a film I’ve wanted to see for a while, though I knew I probably wouldn’t be in the audience this was directed toward. It’s not my type of thing, but if you like Asian horror, especially wacky Asian horror, than you should definitely check this out.

5/10

Horror House on Highway Five (1985)

Directed by Richard Casey [Other horror films: Horror House on Highway 6 (2014)]

Horror House on Highway Five is a movie I’ve wanted to see for a long time. I never deluded myself that it’d be a good movie, but it’s still something I wanted to scratch off my list for years, and I can say now that I have seen it, and unsurprisingly, I was disappointed.

Which is sort of amusing, because the film is more ambitious than I would have thought, but it’s in that ambition that it lost me. See, all I knew about this film was that there was a killer in a Richard Nixon mask and he terrorized some college kids.

What I didn’t know is that this Nixon-masked killer isn’t the only killer – there’s two other antagonists who kidnap people as part of some unspecified sacrifice, and there’s also some stuff dealing with a Nazi scientist who came to the USA. It’s also moderately comedic, which is something else I wasn’t clear on.

Look, if the film had been just a single guy in a Nixon mask going around and killing college kids, it might have been uninspired, but at least it’s a plot I can get behind. What this movie had was just too out there – I don’t know why they decided to deal with a Nazi scientist, some brothers who were ineffectual half the time, and brain parasites (?) that may or may not be a delusion of one of the characters. It just complicated things unnecessarily.

So with the bizarre plot out of the way, it’s time to talk about what few performances did something for me. Max Manthey was occasionally amusing. Michael Castagnolia worked okay with Susan Leslie, and Irene Cagen could dance with the best of them.

There are some funny scenes here, of course. A man and woman driving by encounter the Nixon-masked killer, leading to some great lines, from ‘Is he giving me the fingeroo?’ to ‘he sure is a big motha.’ It’s partially the delivery, partially the dialogue, but it’s funny. There’s also Gary’s (Max Manthey) dance, which reminded me of Crispin Glover’s classy dance in Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter. There’s also a character who finds a dead cat in the back of their van, and the other character there literally doesn’t seem concerned at all. It’s just wacky.

I can imagine in some situations Horror House on Highway Five can be a fun movie to watch, but most of those situations involve drugs and alcohol. It can be funny, yes, but personally, that’s not enough, and while I sort of dug the final scenes, this isn’t a movie I particularly enjoyed, and though I’m happy I finally saw it, I can’t say it’s really worth seeing unless you’re into bizarre and possibly drug-influenced movies.

5/10

The Initiation (1984)

Directed by Larry Stewart [Other horror films: N/A] & Peter Crane [Other horror films: N/A]

This is one of those bigger 80’s slashers that I’ve long heard about but never took the time to watch until now. I didn’t know much going into this one, and come the finale, I did find The Initiation pretty close to top-notch.

Plot-wise, the movie is sort of interesting. A lot of films that deal with teenagers or college kids staying someplace overnight (be it One Dark Night, Chopping Mall, or Hide and Go Shriek) would have the individuals get there early on, and most of the movie would take place there. In this case, it’s not until halfway through the film, following character introductions and some plot set-up, that we even see the mall where this sorority prank will take place.

On this sidenote, I have to briefly pause from the movie and reiterate my distaste of fraternities and sororities. This film wasn’t near as bad as movies like Pledge Night or Final Exam, because the prank here was relatively harmless (though it was illegal, so here’s a case of a sorority pushing their pledges to actively break the law – great sisterhood rolls eyes), and there was one character who saw how foolish the whole thing was (kudos to Paula Knowles’ speech), so it’s still tolerable in The Initiation’s case, but boy, do I despise the concept of sororities and fraternities.

Back to the movie, though, I’ll admit that I didn’t see the finale coming. I was of two minds as to how the film could end, and one of my ideas was somewhat shot about halfway through the film. I’m not sure if I particularly love how they chose to end the film, but there were enough hints throughout, and as much as I might have preferred the way I would have concluded it, this ending makes more sense.

Daphne Zuniga (The Dorm That Dripped Blood and The Fly II) made for a pretty likable lead, and I thought she did well. Vera Miles (Psycho), who played her mother, was quite unlikable, and I couldn’t stand her for a single moment, possessing that ‘Karen’ vibe, so she did a good job with a detestable human. Clu Gulager (Hunter’s Blood, A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy’s Revenge, and The Return of the Living Dead) didn’t appear all that often, but it is always nice to see a familiar face.

Others did pretty well also. James Read was my favorite character of the movie, though he did get testy with another of my favorites, played by Joy Jones (in her sole role). Patti Heider played one of the most ill-fitted characters I’ve ever seen to have a job involving the mentally ill, and the other two central sorority pledges, played by Hunter Tylo (credited as Deborah Morehart) and Marilyn Kagan, did well also, especially Kagen, who played another rather likable character.

None of the kills are absolutely amazing, but we did get some fun ones, such as an archery kill, a throat-slitting, an off-screen decapitation (but the silhouettes were nice), some cultivator action (it’s that garden tool with claws – you learn some new things every day), and lastly, a surprise appearance by a harpoon gun. None of these deaths are overly gruesome, but all are of decent quality.

If I’m being honest, I didn’t expect to enjoy The Initiation as much as I did. It’s a pretty fun slasher, and though I have some minor qualms regarding the finale, it’s certainly a movie that slasher fans may want to check out.

8/10

Into the Darkness (1986)

Directed by David Kent-Watson [Other horror films: The Eye of Satan (1992)]

This is a relatively obscure British SOV film, and there’s probably a good reason for that. It’s not entirely without merit – large portions took place, and were shot in, Malta, giving it a Mediterranean feeling – but it’s quite weak in most aspects, and it’s probably not a film that many horror fans would go out of their way to watch.

In fact, if anyone is cognizant of this movie, it’s likely because Donald Pleasence appears. He’s not the star – in fact, he doesn’t say anything until 51 minutes into the movie – but he does make some appearances, and if I’m being honest, he may even be the most enjoyable cast member of the movie.

To be fair, John Saint Ryan’s not bad. I actually think he made for a decent lead. Brett Sinclair had some strong moments, and Paul Flanagan was okay, but Pleasence was definitely where most of the enjoyment came from. The four central women – Heather Alexander, Sara Hollamby, Jadie Rivas, and Jeanette Driver – all felt somewhat interchangeable, and I’m only mentioning Polly Jo Pleasence’s short appearance out of deep respect for her father, Donald Pleasance. John Saint Ryan, Brett Sinclair, and mostly Pleasance make this movie work, as far as the performances can.

Which isn’t easy, because the story, while serviceable, is quite basic. During a photo shoot in Malta, a killer bumps off those related to the shoot. Not in exciting ways, either – in fact, most of the kills are off-screen, and what kills we do see, well, it doesn’t make an impact whatsoever.

What gives the film a bit more oompf is the Malta location – filmed in the Jerma Palace Hotel (now closed, but it was once one of the finest hotels in Marsaskala, Malta) and the city of Naxxar, Into the Darkness definitely can boast a unique location. There’s a fun scene in some catacombs, another in some old ruins. It can’t make up for how stale a lot of the film feels, but it is a fresh sight.

Even so, a lot of the film is quite dull, which can’t be a surprise, as the kills aren’t good, and while the performances can be okay, we don’t get Donald Pleasence until 50 minutes in, and it’s a bit of a drag to get there. The finale is pretty decent – we get plenty of red herrings throughout the film, and while the killer’s motive is no surprise, the identity is decently well-hidden – and perhaps the best part of the film.

The one gripe I do have about the finale is this – a woman is being chased by someone, a chase that began in a hotel room. Logically, I’d think that she would leave the hotel room and go to the hotel lobby, but what actually happens is that she leaves the hotel room, and we cut to her running outside in the deserted streets. I’m not sure how she got outside – did she run past the lobby, waving off the people with concern on their faces, so her chase could be more dramatic? I don’t know, but that scene felt so damn stupid.

Small thing though it may be, I also wanted to mention the soundtrack, filled with songs from Chris Rea. It’s not a name I actively knew before the film, but apparently he was somewhat well-known, and his music here isn’t shabby. I think the best song might be “Out of the Darkness”, but there’s another called “Love’s Strange Ways” that has a soft, atmospheric vibe to it. Definitely not a bad soundtrack, for whatever that’s worth.

Overall, though, Into the Darkness is what it is. It’s by no means a terrible movie. 80’s slashers from the United Kingdom are somewhat hard to come by (Don’t Open Till Christmas and Goodnight, God Bless are the first two that come to mind), and slashers using Malta as the prime location even rarer. Into the Darkness has some good flavor, but I honestly think it’d only attract either slasher completionists or Donald Pleasence fans.

6/10

They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore (1985)

Directed by Nathan Schiff [Other horror films: Weasels Rip My Flesh (1979), The Long Island Cannibal Massacre (1980)]

Among the most repulsive films I’ve witnessed, They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore is somewhat of a classic, in my eyes. The gore effects here, while often looking exceptionally fake, are absolutely gruesome, and if you want an extreme movie, this is one you have to see.

The plot here is pretty much non-existent. Two southern gardeners in a well-to-do northern community kill and mutilate people. And that’s it. It’s 70 minutes of these two gardeners killing and mutilating people, occasionally taking time off to go to the movies to watch other people kill and mutilate. It’s a good time.

Nathan Schiff is a director I’ve long respected for this movie alone. I’ve not seen his other films (most well-known ones including The Long Island Cannibal Massacre and Weasels Rip My Flesh), but I saw They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore a long time ago, and while I never loved it, it stuck with me, because the gore effects are simply as tasteless as one could imagine.

I won’t spend much time talking about the gore – you have to see the movie for yourself. I can tell you that if you want to see people’s legs and arms cut off with chainsaws and handsaws, then They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore is your movie. If you want to see intestines pulled out of peoples’ stomachs and vaginas and then beat to an unrecognizable pulp, They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore is your movie. And if you want to see faces ripped and torn up, all the way to the bone, with the jaws ripped off and the tongues ripped out, their eyes squeezed from their sockets (and they always made a point of squishing them in their hands), then I need only repeat myself once more:

They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore is your movie.

The dialogue is often quite flat and stale, but it’s also some of the most hilarious stuff I’ve ever heard. From the weak and utterly without emotion “Please don’t rape me,” to the way these two women get out of captivity – wait, no, I need to explain this scene in detail.

See, two women have been captured by the maniac gardeners, but luckily, one of the women is a psychiatrist. She knows how to deal with the mentally disturbed (“You are in great need of psychiatric help”), and will use those skills to get out of the situation. So when one of the men comes in, she asks him to grab her mirror and look at himself. Once he does, and he looks into the mirror, she says, her tone helpful, “Look, look how fucking ugly you are. You’re a disgrace.”

I lol’d. A lot.

Or when two cops are discussing a murder – they’re standing over a body (we don’t see the body – we don’t see an inkling of a body – but it’s apparently there), and one of the cops is quite negative when considering the killers, thinking that the boxcars happened 40 years too soon (referring to the Holocaust). The other cop says they still need to solve the crime, and the cop replies “Fuck that, I’m going home to listen to my Billie Holiday tape.”

I lol’d. A lot. It’s funnier because these cops literally never show up again. They were in this single scene that had zero relevance, and that’s it.

Another point here – we get some musical numbers. One is a song that is played on the radio that these two women are listening to. The song, sung by a woman, is about how stupid she [the singer] is, and the catchy chorus goes “That’s why he calls me Dumb Dumb Yummy Yummy Dumb Dumb.” I couldn’t make that up if I tried.

Also, toward the end of the film, the killers are laying back and relaxing, one of them strumming a guitar, the other playing a harmonica. And they sing for us, and here’s the whole song:

“We came up here from Texas / But it didn’t work out for us / We met a lot of fine people / But they ain’t around no more / We were professional gardeners / But it got to be a bore / So seek some new adventure / Cause we don’t cut the grass no more.”

Genius.

Oh, and I forgot one of my favorite lines in the movie. While a woman is attempting to defend herself, and beating on one of the gardeners (played by John Smihula, who does beautifully), the gardener says “Keep this up, bitch. There’s going to be a lot of irate neighbors complaining about their uncut lawns.”

I lol’d.

This movie is a mess, and it’s not a good movie, but it can be quite an amusing movie if you’re into low-budget, ultra-gory films. They Don’t Cut the Grass Anymore is something special, and while I can’t honestly give it a high rating, I can say that it’s a treat in many ways.

6/10

…E tu vivrai nel terrore! L’aldilà (1981)

Directed by Lucio Fulci [Other horror films: Una lucertola con la pelle di donna (1971), Non si sevizia un paperino (1972), Il cav. Costante Nicosia demoniaco, ovvero: Dracula in Brianza (1975), Sette note in nero (1977), Zombi 2 (1979), Paura nella città dei morti viventi (1980), Gatto nero (1981), Quella villa accanto al cimitero (1981), Lo squartatore di New York (1982), Manhattan Baby (1982), Murderock – Uccide a passo di danza (1984), Aenigma (1987), Zombi 3 (1988), Il fantasma di Sodoma (1988), Quando Alice ruppe lo specchio (1988), La casa nel tempo (1989), La dolce casa degli orrori (1989), Un gatto nel cervello (1990), Demonia (1990), Hansel e Gretel (1990), Voci dal profondo (1991), Le porte del silenzio (1992)]

Commonly known as The Beyond, Lucio Fulci’s …E tu vivrai nel terrore! L’aldilà is definitely a slice of Italian horror worth seeing, if only for the goriness alone. I don’t personally find it an amazing movie, but it can be decently fun if you’re a fan of Fulci’s work.

I’ve seen The Beyond before, but it’s been a long time. I’ve only seen it the one time, and I can’t quite fathom exactly how long ago that would have been, so coming into this one again was a treat. I was slightly hesitant – when I revisited The House By the Cemetery in recent times, I wasn’t blown away – but this film has more going for it, at least in my eyes.

The story, such as it was, isn’t too bad, dealing with a hotel placed on one of the Seven Gateways of Hell. It’s the second part of Fulci’s Gates of Hell trilogy, sandwiched between City of the Living Dead and The House By the Cemetery. Luckily, there’s not much reason to watch them in order, as they stand alone perfectly fine, and like I said, I found this a bit better than The House By the Cemetery.

For a certainty, it’s not for the plot, which is a bit janky. I mean, let’s be honest, most people don’t come into a Fulci movie for the plot, so that’s not a big problem, and the main point – a woman inherits a hotel, and soon terrifying things start happening – gets across just fine. And since most probably come for the gore, they certainly came to the right place.

It’s hard to say what my favorite scene here was – part of me wants to say either the final scene, which was quite creepy (if not a bit nonsensical), another part when the characters leave the hotel, but in the light, we see plenty of souls through the windows – that scene was shot quite beautifully.

As far as the gore goes, though, I’m a sucker for eyes. So are tarantulas, apparently, as a paralyzed man has one of his eyes punctured and torn from his head by a tarantula. Another one takes a portion of his lip; another, his tongue. As someone with mild arachnophobia, that was a harsh scene. There was also a great shotgun blast to the head, along with someone’s head shoved through a spike, causing, you guessed it, her eye to come out. A woman got her ear and throat torn off by a dog, and a woman’s face got melted by acid. All around, a film for the whole family.

Only two performances come close to mattering, and I’m not sure that they really do, as they don’t really impact much that happens in the film. Catriona MacColl (City of the Living Dead and The House By the Cemetery) was perfectly adequate as the lead, though her character can be a bit of a dick, I feel. David Warbeck (Miami Golem, Rat Man, and The Black Cat) was more well-rounded, but his character also wasted a lot of bullets in the last twenty minutes, so I can’t love him too much.

Speaking of which, the final twenty minutes of this one does contain an all-out zombie attack. To be honest, I forgot that happened in this film, but the zombies themselves (while not looking particularly great – Burial Ground zombies were totally more awesome) were appropriately creepy, and it led to a solid finale. Also, the score in this one was fantastic – that piano theme (as sampled in Necro’s “As Deadly As Can Be”) was simply gorgeous – so I can’t be too unhappy.

And that’s really how I feel about the movie as a whole – it was an enjoyable rewatch. It’s not my favorite Fulci movie, as both Don’t Torture a Duckling and The New York Ripper exist, but it is a fun slice of supernatural and zombie horror.

7.5/10